top of page
Jon Adams

Why was Kongress needed?

  • Neurodivergent creatives have faced systemic exclusion and discrimination for many years. Over this time ND creatives appear to have sought refuge in various other groups such as disability arts and outsider art with limited success or have simply been silenced. If the arts landscape, organisations and founders continue in failing to actively include neurodivergent people on their terms, then they are actively excluding- and exclusion is discrimination.

  • For far too long Neurodivergent creatives have been sidelined, left without appropriate recognition or support and have not reached their full potential and richness, often absent in the arts landscape and wider society.

  • The development of Neurodivergent culture is relatively new and Neurodivergent people have not before been able to organise. By our very nature, it continues to be hard for us to organise but our time has come facilitated by social media connecting what once were isolated pockets and clusters. Neurodivergent people are it seems not prepared to live in the traditionalist neuro-lithic period (Stone age tribalism) characterised by neurotypical neuro-adversity (unnecessary difficulty) nor join in and gameplay others ‘snakes and escalators’ neuro-perversity and imposed awkwardness any more.

Kongress: About
Jon Adams.JPG

What we found

  • For Kongress, we have read and listened to many emotive anguished and challenging stories. Neurodivergent creatives have said they've felt constrained and limited, not in terms of their creativity but rather where and how they may ‘fit in’ within an arts landscape that repeatedly fails to recognise and engage with their narrative on Neurodivergent terms. Almost all respondents, 94% said they found their communication needs were often misunderstood and not supported properly. Whilst Creative people have always faced barriers, these may be exacerbated within each of the different Neurodivergent cultures. As well as this, Neurodivergent creatives also face additional unique barriers.

  • Neurodivergent people are not broken or unnatural, or a mistake, they are simply part of human neurodiversity. Nature loves diversity, and yet we impose a hierarchy. Of our respondents, 94% felt the representation of any Neurodivergent culture's narrative by non-neurodivergent people was problematic and 55% felt members of Neurodivergent cultures other than their did not own understand their ways of working.

  • Neurodivergence is more than just an ‘Arts movement’, it is about a section of society where the majority has traditionally been misunderstood, their work appropriated and personally dismissed as either too difficult or mentally unwell to work with. There is mental health and well-being consequences from this exclusion and oppression. Nearly 90% felt a lack of support for low self-confidence, anxiety, or depression had stopped them from engaging in the arts and 53% felt that a traumatic experience had prevented them from engaging in the arts. This needs to change urgently.

  1. Neurodivergence Is Key To Creativity: While we focused on barriers, we must also note that many neurodivergent people we spoke to were very clear that their neurodivergence is key to their creativity. It gives them the ability to become interested in something and follow the threads that lead to creating work. It gives them the ability to focus on becoming really good at something, learning new skills as they go. So we must recognise: neurodivergence itself is not a barrier to the arts or to being an artist. The barriers are external.

  2. Barriers Before Attending: While many efforts have been made to create ‘autistic friendly’ performances and gallery openings, which may typically include reducing noise levels, increasing lighting levels, and accepting autistic behaviours, our survey identified that for many neurodivergent people, the greater challenges may be about getting there in the first place. We found people faced barriers to booking tickets for events, workshops and conferences including unfriendly box office practices, and unclear online booking systems. People were concerned about travelling to venues, particularly those in London or other large cities. Neurodivergent people often worry about what to expect, so unfamiliar venues create barriers. There is anxiety on arrival about finding entrances, and about knowing procedures (the three-minute bell in a theatre, for example, is a very coded procedure). Many venues provide limited access advice, which is often more geared towards physical disabilities. Neurodivergent artists, as well as audiences, need this support. Crowds outside and in the foyer before the show or event can create anxiety for neurodivergent people. Generally, not knowing what to expect, including but not limited to running times and intervals, creates a formidable barrier to neurodivergent people. Giving good advice and support before the event can, if not remove, at least reduce the barrier for neurodivergent people.

  3. Physical Environment: It is not surprising that many neurodivergent people mentioned the ways that the physical environment creates barriers to accessing the arts - many of these are well known, but still persist. What is clear is that different people have different needs, and the one-size-fits-all ‘autistic friendly performance’ is not the right solution for everyone. Lighting was frequently raised. While the solution by many venues has been to increase lighting levels - for example, at accessible theatre performances where the house lights stay up - this is not always the solution. As well as lighting, many neurodivergent people have issues around sound. This includes ambient noise - loud furniture on concrete floors, noisy hand-dryers in toilets, and so on. It may include over-amplified music or special effects during a performance. A lack of access to safe and quiet spaces was also raised as a barrier. 

  4. Funding: Many neurodivergent people find it hard to access funding to support their practice. Often, this is because funding is not tailored to neurodivergent ways of working. It is either designed to fund working towards a set outcome, which doesn’t allow for the way neurodivergent people ‘wander’ as they explore new ideas. Or it is too focused on delivering outcomes such as workshops, which some neurodivergent people find hard to deliver. Neurodivergence does not seem to be widely recognised as a disadvantaged category in its own right when it comes to funding avenues, which further reduces access to funding opportunities.

  5. Networking: Many people in the arts will say that networking is difficult: but for neurodivergent people, the barriers already identified before attending, and those around the physical environment, increase the difficulty. In addition, to be effective, networking is a regular commitment - and for neurodivergent people who may find some days harder than others, this is an additional barrier

  6. Engaging WIth Organisations: Organisations are funded to create a supportive infrastructure for artists and the production of work. Neurodivergent artists can bring benefits to arts organisations. However, many neurodivergent artists felt ignored, misunderstood, and overlooked, and identified a number of barriers which exist between them and organisations. 

  7. Recovery Times: To overcome the additional barriers they face, neurodivergent people put huge amounts of additional effort into commonplace activities like networking, attending private views, or going to a performance. There will be even more effort taken to actually speak at an event, take part in an exhibition, or perform a show. This effort can impact mental health, but also create physical exhaustion. Therefore, neurodivergent people need extra time to recover. This recovery time is not factored into project plans and falls outside of daily rates of pay

Kongress: About
Jon Adams.JPG

Urgent Proposals

  • For Neurodivergent cultures to flourish, it must be our choice to illustrate our lived experiences, collective narratives and individual story; to not only reclaim but actively reframe and create our own narrative in the wider cultural landscape and social context. Would the appropriation of our narrative, language, or culture be acceptable if applied to any other minority? It should be seen as deeply inappropriate. But to achieve this we need to be listened to and valued on our terms and enabled to shine creatively in a world that says it values difference but in practice shuns us or expects us to leave difference at the door. it’s not rocket science but if you wish to know what a neurodivergent creative needs, you simply ask them, guesswork from a neurotypical point of view without referencing respecting or understanding double empathy issues can harm.

  • There are some distinct dangers ahead. There seem to be some groups defining determining and imposing neurodiversity from a neuromonocultural point of view and organisations thinking this is just another tick box fauxND exercise. Nearly 96% of Neurodivergent respondent thought a lack of understanding of both neurodiversity and Neurodivergent creatives by arts organisations was a distinct barrier to potential engagement and 94% felt all arts organisations and funders needed a Neurodivergent arts strategy.  87% felt a Neurodivergent arts strategy should be written in co-production between the organisation and Neurodivergent creatives, 13% externally by Neurodivergent creatives. No respondents felt it should be produced Internally by the organisation without reference to Neurodivergent people. Nothing for us without us.

  • The systemic and traditional view needs change from vague awareness to authentic acceptance- if not for us, certainly for the next generations of Neurodivergent young people, including language used with us, about us and towards us. Barriers encountered exist not only in arts traditionalism, attitudes and systems but applying for funding, finding opportunities, networking, recovery time and accessing the arts within organisations and venues for sensory reasons. Nearly 65% said their sensory sensitivities prevented them from attending a live performance, exhibition, or workshop.

  • Immutable change can only come if neurodivergent people are given time and space to lead on their own terms. Others can document and write our story but only neurodivergent people can evolve their own cultural narratives. A non-conformist conversation and recognition of neurodivergence and the different cultures, languages and practices that exist within the neurodiversi-verse would be a huge step forward.

  • We all, both Neurotypical and Neurodivergent alike, need to be the change makers.

Kongress: About

Monitoring Question
Averaged over the three surveys

FullSizeRender (7).jpg
FullSizeRender (8).jpg
Kongress: Projects

Gender

Survey 1         
Female                51.11%

Male                22.22%

Non-Binary / Genderqueer    17.22%

Prefer not to say          2.78% 

Prefer to self describe          6.67% 


Survey 2         
Female                49.50%

Male                24.75%

Non-Binary/ Genderqueer    17.82%

Prefer not to say          2.97%

Prefer to self-describe          4.95%


Survey 3         
  Female            49.25% 

Male                19.40% 

Non-Binary / Genderqueer    11.94% 

Prefer not to say          7.46% 

Prefer to self describe?        11.94%

Age

Survey 1
Under 18     1.68%

18-24         12.29%

25-34        23.46%

35-44        22.35%

45-54        25.14%

55-64        11.73% 

65+         3.35% 

​

Survey 2
Under 18      2.02%

18-24        12.12%

25-34        24.24%

35-44        22.22%

45-54        26.26%

55-64        11.11%

65+          2.02%

​

                Survey 3                 
Under 18      0.00%

18-24          6.15%

25-34        20.00%

35-44        23.08%

45-54        32.31%

55-64        16.92%

65+          1.54%

Kongress: Meet the Team
bottom of page